Education
has long been seen as the foundation for development and success. With the general public’s increasing awareness of the importance of
education
, some have suggested that access to tertiary
education
be granted universally,
while
others hold the opposite belief.
This
essay aims to elaborate on both of these views and present my personal opinion that university admission should be made based on clear standards and requirements.
An equal chance of higher
education
offers key benefits for secondary graduates and society as a whole. Chief among them is a diverse academic environment. The reason for
this
rests on the
students
’ range of abilities, interests, and socioeconomic backgrounds, which could not be attained with limiting access for a certain population of school leavers.
This
creates an inclusive environment where
students
can reap the benefits of social cohesion and the introduction to various perspectives.
Furthermore
, offering admission to all secondary graduates can contribute to societal prosperity.
This
is because tertiary
education
equips
students
with the rudimentary skills and professional knowledge for future career
pathFix the agreement mistake
show examples
. By admitting
students
regardless of their academic abilities and cultural backgrounds, universities can solidify their roles in producing an educated workforce, which
further
boosts economic growth and national wealth.
However
, I would argue that universal access to higher
education
hinders
students
’ potential development. To be more specific, tertiary
education
’s elite image among
students
has successfully spurred them on to excel academically.
Therefore
, making the prestige of university attendance available for everyone deters
students
from striving for academic excellence, causing a significant reduction in
students
’
caliberChange the spelling
show examples
due to
a lack of competition. Most importantly, academic readiness is probably the greatest concern. Secondary graduation is based on a sufficient level of curriculum completion, which lacks a general assessment of the skill set vital for tertiary
education
.
As a result
, shortlisting capable
students
warrants the establishment of clear standards and specific ways of testing
such
as interviews and academic records to ensure
students
’ necessary skills to encounter academic challenges.
In conclusion, despite
education
’s universal significance, I subscribe to the belief that university administrators should not grant admission to all school leavers, but single out suitable and qualified ones based on particular requirements and conditions.