According to
many, in order for employees to increase their position in
workplaceAdd an article
show examples
, an extended period of experience
needCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
to be
requirementAdd an article
show examples
. I strongly disagree with
this
perspective on the grounds that, by
promotion
period,
workforceCorrect article usage
show examples
faces both motivation challenges and injustices.
Since professions are of paramount importance
forChange preposition
show examples
people's
lifesCorrect your spelling
show examples
, every person who is a part of
,Remove the comma
show examples
wants to step up. To most of them,
this
is the
primerCorrect your spelling
show examples
aspect
to operateChange preposition
show examples
efficiently.
Due to
the fact that
costCorrect article usage
show examples
of
lifeReplace the word
show examples
has soared, starting wages are not sufficient, especially for those who are compelled to feed a family.
Therefore
, making
promotion
tied to long working years is
noCorrect your spelling
show examples
beneficial for both employer and
employee'sChange the noun form
show examples
.
This
situation leads to laziness as extra
workingReplace the word
show examples
would not mean anything. Consider a construction worker. If he knew the fact that no matter how hard he
worksWrong verb form
show examples
, he becomes
supervisorCorrect article usage
show examples
no sooner than five years, he would not give himself
toChange preposition
show examples
work.
Moreover
, correlating
promotion
to workspan is clearly unfair, especially to brilliant minds. Not everyone has
sameCorrect article usage
show examples
perception or capacity.
While
some individuals have restricted abilities, others may be utterly capable.
This
is what
managementCorrect article usage
show examples
level needs. By keeping highly skilled professionals in
sameCorrect article usage
show examples
positions, neither companies get
benefitAdd the particle
show examples
from them nor
theseAdd a missing verb
show examples
people
fulfillChange the spelling
show examples
their goals.
This
would be a mutually harmful implementation, which never be executed by massive companies.
In conclusion, implementing
time-relatedCorrect article usage
show examples
promotion
mechanism not only diminishes staff's performance
,Remove the comma
show examples
but
also
culminates in inequalities.