There is a controversy about whether substantial salaries, gained by
fewCorrect article usage
show examples
individuals
, could be beneficial or it is a problem that demands
governmentsChange the noun form
show examples
attention.
While
imposing a salary ceiling can bring about advantages,
iChange the capitalization
show examples
am of the opinion that the negative consequences of
such
approachCorrect article usage
show examples
would pale
itsChange preposition
show examples
merits.
Balancing income
distribution
can benefit both
individuals
and society at large. If a wage ceiling would be imposed, the wealth gap between the rich and the poor would diminish.
This
minimized gap ensures that all walks of life get access to equal amenities and thrive alongside. In today’s societies, those from disadvantaged backgrounds are obliged to attend state schools, which are usually poor-funded and are not well-equipped,
while
children'sChange noun form
show examples
of affluent families opt for private schools, where their talents would be recognized, and cutting-edge technologies would be provided
accordingly
so that they could thrive and achieve
further
achievements. A balanced wage
distribution
,
on the other hand
, minimizes
this
discrepancy and enables gifted students to obtain degrees based on their merits.
Additionally
, unbalanced education opportunities can cause
further
social problems. A huge gap between affluent and poor citizens increases the rates of crime. The penurious usually opt for pickpocketing and stealing, as climbing the career ladder is an impossible option for poorly-educated
individuals
.
Consequently
, capping high salaries would benefit all citizens regardless of their social status.
High salaries contribute to hard work,
individuals
' well-being, and economic growth. Offering high incomes motivates people to work diligently and necessitates them to bring about their optimal mental and physical force, ultimately leading to groundbreaking developments.
For instance
, American
policy-makersCorrect your spelling
show examples
believe one should be rewarded based on their merits and abilities,
while
Europeans opt for a more balanced income
distribution
. Comparing European and American workforce, it is obvious that the latter group work for extended hours and have already gained more rewards in various fields when compared to their counterpart. The reason behind
this
phenomenon is the limitless revenue generation.
Secondly
, generating equivalent revenue can lead to unhealthy habits. By providing a more equitable
distribution
of wealth, people start to seek the rush of adrenaline, previously gained by surpassing their peers, in other areas. In a futile search for joy in dangerous sexual
behaviorsChange the spelling
show examples
, addiction not only substitutes competition thrill but
also
poseCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
detrimental effects on
individuals
' mental and physical health.
In conclusion the decision to
whether Correct word choice
show examples
impose
salaryCorrect article usage
show examples
ceiling or not is a complex decision.
While
controlling the
distribution
of wealth could be profitable,
however
,
iChange the capitalization
show examples
believe its downturns outweigh its benefits.