Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation of committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.

some people

argued

Wrong verb form

argue

show examples

that the circumstances of an individual

crime

should be considered when performing the punishment. white that others say that

there

Replace the word

their

show examples

crime

should be punishments for each kind of

crime

. In my opinion, I think that it is better to be setting a single penalty for each type of

crime

. one of the reasons for which are should be considered each

crime

is that people have a motivation in special, depending on the circumstances of the

crime

, since in many cases illegal acts are more or less than others,

for example

,

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

serial killer, who kills for pleasure and taste, structure a plan that they have previously made,

whereas

another person who kills another in self-defence, it made for survive, these cannot be condemned in the same way. because their acts are of different origins and impulses.

On the other hand

, when these crimes are classified for each kind of punishment it is effective and organizes the penal system allowing a shorter and faster process for each

crime

.

For instance

, if one person robbery a bank the

crime

can be given a penalty of around 10 years, since

this

type of violation that's it fixed for each

crime

. In conclusion, in my opinion, both statements have the same purpose,

although

, I believe that choosing a permanent punishment for each type of

crime

of the better way a penalty.