We live in a world of technology these days. While the internet brings with it clear advantages, the problems in terms of control and security of information outweighs the advantages.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Your essay should have clear and distinct paragraphs including an introduction, body paragraphs with main points, and a conclusion.
task achievement
Try to develop more comprehensive ideas. Explain your points in greater depth and consider providing evidence or examples to strengthen your argument.
task achievement
Include specific examples that are directly relevant to your argument. This will help to clarify your position and provide evidence for your claims.
task achievement
You have presented your main argument consistently throughout the essay, maintaining focus on the debate about internet advantages and disadvantages.
Include an introduction and conclusion
A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.
The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.
The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:
Summary
Restatement of thesis
Prediction or recommendation
Example:
To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported.After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.
Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:
In the contemporary world, the demand for alternative energy sources like solar energy is growing exponentially in order to make our planet greener by harnessing the Sun's power. It is my contention that while the major benefits such as global warming, the infinite volume of potentially harnessable energy and cost-effectiveness address the rationale behind this humongous demand, only a few demerits like insufficient energy production during nighttime and high volume of occupied land by the solar panels are available to highlight.
Fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas have long been the primary sources of energy in many countries. However, an increasing number of nations are encouraging the use of alternative energy sources, including wind and solar power. This trend is a highly positive development due to its environmental, economic, and social benefits.
These days, the authorities are paying more in the field of arts such as Music and Painting. However, public services such as good education, health care, and public transportation are neglected by them. I completely agree with the statement that, the government should take adequate actions for the upliftment of public services than the arts and the reasons for my argument shall be stated in the upcoming paragraphs.
There is a widely held view that a new city plan should include more recreational areas such as public parks, gardens, and sports grounds and fewer shopping malls. I wholeheartedly agree with the notion because they play a significant role in human health and well-being.
Nowadays, university degrees become ubiquitous and mandatory right for people to learn deeper into a specific field and multiple bachelor's majors are offered by colleges to students. It has been a great contention, whether the government should decide a pupil's subjects or whether students should be permitted to choose their career path freely. While determining a disciple's career path would be beneficial for efficient resource allocation, it might be quite opposite to their passion.