Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is contended that governments should invest more of their

money

in railways

instead

of

roads

. I strongly agree with

this

statement as using

money

on

roads

has its drawbacks and

this

measure encompasses the potential to improve the environment.

Firstly

, building a rail transport system encourages people to use public transport more often

instead

of private

vehicles

.

This

reduces the amount of

vehicles

such

as cars, trucks and motorbikes on the road. One of the many contributors to pollution is

vehicles

as

such

.

For instance

, the engines of these automobiles release harmful gases

such

as sulphur dioxide which contributes to poor air quality, affecting the health of many people.

In addition

, fewer automobiles on the road reduce traffic congestion, especially during peak hours.

This

makes it easier for people to reach their destination in a punctual manner.

Furthermore

, it is expensive to maintain and build

roads

. With many

vehicles

and traffic,

roads

eventually wear out,

therefore

, they need to be rebuilt or re-polished.

For example

,

due to

the hot weather and a greater proportion of private

vehicles

being used in my country, potholes are very common and often have to be patched up. In the long run, the maintenance of these

roads

costs more

money

than building a railway, causing the government to ignore other important issues. In conclusion, I believe that governments should spend

money

on building railways rather than

roads

due to

the prospect that pollution in the environment can be minimised. On top of that, constructing railway systems encompasses a greater benefit in the long run as it is more cost-efficient.