Modern societies need specialists in certain fields, but not in others. Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society. Those who choose to study less relevant subjects should not receive government funding. Would the advantages of such an educational policy outweigh the disadvantages?
#societies #specialists #fields #people #governments #university #fees #students #study #subjects #society #government #policy
People
have different opinions that the government
should pay tutor fees for students
whose majors are needed by society. Additionally
, those whose majors are less relevant should not receive government
funding. In my view, I do not believe the advantages of the educational policy outweigh the disadvantages, I will discuss the reasons for this
viewpoint in this
essay.
Firstly
, the main advantage is government
funds should be used in areas that are more prioritized and useful to the residents. For example
, like public transportation systems, water conservancy facilities
electrical facilities
et cetera, those facilities
have a more direct impact on people
's daily lives. Government
should spend expenditure on those policies to increase people
's welfare significantly, however
, students
should pay their own tuition fees instead
.
Secondly
, despite these advantages, the funding supported by the government
would be abused by students
. For instance
, In Taiwan, we have a college major that is
government
-paid for students
, and after students
graduate, they need to work for a government
institution. The government
provides tuition and jobs that will make the students
who do not know what their passion is, they will apply for this
major, but that would occupy the opportunities which students
have passion for, or the students
really need the funding for study. Therefore
, the funding in specialized subjects will let students
not choose other subjects which do not have support from the government
, and abuse would be a problem resulting in unfairness to students
.
In conclusion, the government
spending money on livelihood facilities
would enhance people
's living quality, meanwhile, students
paying their own university fees would not result in all students
applying for the major which has been supported, which could avoid the abuse and the cause of students
who are really interested not being able to apply for the faculties they want.Submitted by meniwii.c on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Provide more balanced arguments for both advantages and disadvantages to ensure a comprehensive response.
task achievement
Ensure each point is clearly explained and supported with specific details or examples.
coherence cohesion
Improve the logical structure by ensuring that each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next.
coherence cohesion
The essay presents a clear position and a well-defined introduction and conclusion.
task achievement
Main points are identifiable and generally well-supported with examples.