In many public places around the world, smoking is banned, and many people believe that
this
is a beneficial measure. Linking Words
This
essay fully supports the statement, as it can reduce the incidence of smoking-related diseases among both passive and young smokers.
Prohibiting smoking in public spaces is an effective way to decrease the prevalence of second-hand smoke illnesses. Research shows that non-smokers have a higher risk of developing lung diseases compared to smokers. Linking Words
This
is because Linking Words
while
smokers use filters on their cigarettes to block some harmful substances, non-smokers are exposed to the full range of hazardous chemicals in the smoke. Linking Words
For instance
, Linking Words
although
Indonesia is one of the largest cigarette producers in the world, the number of patients with COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) decreased dramatically after the government banned smoking in parks, schools, public transport, and hospitals.
Implementing Linking Words
this
ban will Linking Words
also
prevent Linking Words
children
from starting to smoke and experiencing health issues. Use synonyms
Children
can easily mimic the Use synonyms
behavior
of their parents or other adults without fully understanding the consequences. In comparison to adults, cigarettes pose greater risks for Change the spelling
behaviour
children
, and it is often more challenging for them to quit once they begin. Use synonyms
For example
, in the USA, which has the highest rate of cancer cases, there has been a dramatic decline in lung cancer among patients who started smoking before the age of 18 after the first Black president, Barack Obama, introduced regulations limiting smoking to designated areas.
In conclusion, establishing regulations to prohibit smoking in public areas is an excellent proposal, as it could protect Linking Words
children
and non-smokers from smoking-related illnesses Use synonyms
such
as COPD and lung cancer.Linking Words
lulukfuru