There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically. As a result, some people believe that non-academic subjects, such as physical education and cookery, should be removed from the school syllabus so that children can concentrate on academic work. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.

In recent years, many

children

have struggled with passing core academic

subjects

,

such

as math and physics.

As a result

, some argue that non-academic

subjects

, like cooking and physical education, should be removed from the school

curriculum

to allow students to focus solely on their academic work. I firmly disagree with

this

view. In my opinion, non-academic

subjects

play a crucial role in a child’s

overall

development and should remain part of the

curriculum

.

This

essay will discuss my perspective. It is true that many students find academic

subjects

challenging, but removing non-academic classes is unlikely to reduce

this

pressure. In fact, doing so could have negative consequences for

children

’s mental and cognitive development.

For example

, a study conducted at Yale University showed that 77% of students experienced cognitive delays when their school removed non-academic

subjects

from the

curriculum

.

This

suggests that these

subjects

provide important balance and stimulation that help

children

process and retain information more effectively.

Moreover

, I believe that non-academic

subjects

, particularly those that involve physical or practical skills, are essential for fostering creativity, critical thinking, and decision-making. These skills are just as important as academic knowledge for a child’s future.

For instance

, a survey in Japan compared

children

who studied only theoretical

subjects

with those who were involved in both academic and practical

subjects

. It found that 66% of

children

who focused solely on academics reported higher levels of anxiety compared to those who participated in a more diverse

curriculum

.

This

highlights the importance of providing

children

with a well-rounded education that includes both academic and practical learning experiences. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the idea of removing non-academic

subjects

from schools.

Instead

, I believe we should encourage a balanced approach that includes a wide range of

subjects

, as

this

will benefit

children

’s mental and emotional well-being,

as well as

their academic performance.