It is believed that students at schools and universities can learn better via technology rather than with teachers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Learning via technological advancements is believed to be better than learning from a teacher. In my opinion,
this
learning style is significantly useful for expanding students’ knowledge, but it can
also
negatively affect their
communication
skills.
To begin
with, technologies easily enable students to gain learning materials more than what is given by school, thanks to internet access. By using it, the learners can access domains and websites containing all the subjects they need, either freely or with payment. Popular learning platforms that have been popular like Ruangguru, Khan Academy, and Zenius thoroughly provide texts and video breakdowns for every subject so that the learning can be easy to understand. Interestingly, the internet is not only providing materials
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
but
also
places for students all around the world to have discussions.
Therefore
, exploring knowledge
also
becomes a fun activity.
In contrast
, utilizing
such
technology leads students to be less communicative. As their activities are mostly on-screen, the frequency of
communication
among them, or at least between a student and his teacher, will be limited. In a short time,
this
could lead to depression because they rarely express their thoughts directly through speaking. In
long
Correct article usage
the long
show examples
term, less frequent
communication
will affect their future career, as most companies nowadays require
communication
skills in job requirements.
To conclude
, I agree that learning via technology is better than from a teacher as far as it is widely utilized since it gives the opportunity to explore and make friends all over the world.
However
, allowing
this
also
produces negative impacts on their
communication
skills.
Submitted by ru.kabiru.biru on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Further develop the contrasting viewpoint by providing examples of where technology may fail in delivering the same educational experience as traditional teaching.
coherence cohesion
Ensure smooth transitions between your ideas to maintain coherence throughout the essay.
coherence cohesion
The essay provides a strong introduction and conclusion that clearly states your position and summarizes the main points.
task achievement
You have effectively used examples like learning platforms (e.g., Ruangguru, Khan Academy, Zenius) that support your argument of technology facilitating a broader access to learning materials.
coherence cohesion
The essay maintains a clear logical progression from the introduction through to the conclusion.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: