It is believed that any form of artwork can only be counted as valid if a
profit
can be made.
This
essay will present why I fully disagree with
this
idea.
To begin
with,
profitability
can be a measure of success for an artistic piece.
For example
, the Mona Lisa, one of the most successful
artworkChange to a plural noun
show examples
in the world, by Leonardo da Vinci is estimated to be worth at least two billion USD. Da Vinci always had a keen eye for details, which translated to many vibrant or subtle details in the Mona Lisa’s design.
However
, relying on
profitability
as a sole determiner of legitimacy does not take into account other significant factors behind artworks.
For instance
, during both World Wars, many countries employed the strategic use of artists to create illustrations that helped boost morale.
Such
propaganda posters, as they are called today, worked effectively and
itsCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
effects
isChange the verb form
show examples
still present today with the popular myth about carrots being
an Remove the article
show examples
anti-Nazi propaganda.
Although
these posters did not generate any monetary value
yet Correct word choice
show examples
they are generally considered
art
with those made by the late USSR highly sought after for their iconic designs.
Therefore
, legitimate
art
does not necessarily equal
profitability
.
In addition
, if
art
is only legitimate if it can be profitable
then
it will lose its inherent
valuesFix the agreement mistake
show examples
. One way a huge
profit
can be made from
art
is through industrialisation where they can be
mass producedAdd a hyphen
show examples
. An instance can be seen with ceramics. Ceramicists were highly regarded for their creative and stunning artworks through
manipulationCorrect article usage
show examples
of clay because of its high volatility.
However
, during the late 1970s, slip casting was employed in
ceramicAdd an article
show examples
making, turning it into a low-cost,
high Add a hyphen
show examples
profitability
product sold en masse.
Although
highly profitable, critics argue that
this
highly industrious process used to make modern ceramic does not constitute
art
but simply another commodity.
Furthermore
,
profit
being used as a measure of legitimacy can invalidate the goal of
non Add a hyphen
show examples
profit
art
organisations.
For instance
, American for the Arts (AFTA) is one of
such
organisations whose goal is to raise awareness and create funds for all forms of
art
, from different civilisations.
This
mission is especially important in America where society still feels the effects of segregation and racial discrimination. By forcing AFTA and other similar organisations to be profitable for legitimacy’s sake, their goals will be invalidated, potentially leading to the loss of many
art
genres.
In conclusion,
withChange preposition
show examples
the aforementioned reasons,
art
legitimacy should not be based on
profitability
. In my opinion,
this
is especially true when
art
is an expression of individual perspective which can be controversial to some but highly appealing to others.