Some people think the government should subsidise fruit and vegetables to make healthy food more affordable. Others argue that the government should tax unhealthy food instead. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Some support subsidies on healthy

foods

,

while

others argue it is better to impose taxes on unhealthy options

instead

. In my opinion, the best way to help

people

improve their diets is to use both strategies together. On the one hand, I agree that taxes on unhealthy

foods

could make them more expensive and

people

would buy less of them

as a result

.

For example

, some countries have implemented taxes on sugary drinks, and

this

has pushed companies to lower sugar content in their products, making them less unhealthy.

However

, simply raising prices does not always result in

people

changing what they eat. Some may still buy junk food (or slightly better versions of it) without significantly improving their nutrition Subsidising healthy

foods

,

on the other hand

, can motivate

people

to make better dietary choices. If fruit and vegetables cost less, even those on tight budgets could include them in their meals.

This

approach can lead to lasting improvements in how

people

eat, so I see it as an important step towards improving public health. The challenge is convincing governments to spend money on subsidies

instead

of relying on tax revenue. In conclusion, I believe that a combination of both policies is the best way forward. By taxing unhealthy

foods

, the government can deter

people

from purchasing them. At the same time, using that revenue to make healthy

foods

more affordable will make them more appealing to consumers, helping everyone improve their eating habits.