The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university .Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The given table compares data about the fraction of students who were satisfied from 5 various dimensions of the university at 3 points in time namely, 2000, 2005, and 2010.

Overall

, it was important that the portion of all items other than facilities and the Range of modules offered increased over the period of 10 years.

According to

the graph, at the start, the printed resources, the main section that most students thought was perfect, formed 87%;

then

they climbed and reported the maximum at just under 90% in 2005;

however

,their proportion reduced to 88% in 2010. the second good factor was the building and the teaching facilities; their percentage stabilized from 2000 to 2010 at 77%. The Teaching Quality composed 65% in 2000;

then

it declined and scored the minimum portion of 63% in 2005;

nevertheless

, it went down to 69% in 2010. The picture demonstrates that, in the beginning, electric resources made up 45%;

thereafter

, they rose and constituted the same fraction as the published type in 2010. The

last

element was the range of modules offered, which fell from nearly one-third in 2000 to 27% in 2010.