It has been suggested that cars and public transport should be banned from city centres and only bicycles be allowed instead. Aisha To what extent do you agree or disagree?

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Some
people
argued
Wrong verb form
argue
show examples
that cities should ban
cars
and public transport from their centres, allowing only bicycles.I totally agree with
this
statement for the reasons that it would bring numerous benefits to the environment,public health and urban life.
Firstly
,banning vehicles and transit systems would significantly reduce
air
pollution in
downtown
Add an article
the downtown
show examples
area.Indeed,
cars
and buses produce harmful gases that pollute the
air
,which can cause health problems like breathing issues and heart diseases.If fewer automobiles and public coaches are on the roads,the
air
will be cleaner and
people
will be less
to
Correct word choice
likely to
show examples
get sick.
For instance
,towns like New Zealand ,where cycling is encouraged over driving have cleaner
air
and healthier residents.
This
illustrates how reducing the number of private vehicles can make a big difference in improving urban
air
quality. Another reason to ban
cars
and transit
bus
Fix the agreement mistake
buses
show examples
in urban
centre
Fix the agreement mistake
centres
show examples
is to encourage a healthier lifestyle.Cycling is a great form of exercise that helps improve fitness and reduce stress.if more individuals choose to cycle
instead
of driving,they would get more physical activity.
In addition
,fewer
cars
on the road would create a safer environment for cyclists,making it easier for
people
to enjoy
this
activity.
For example
,
According to
the latest statistics,
people
in Barcelona can move around faster and more easily.
This
reduction in traffic shows that cutting down on
cars
in city centres can make transportation smoother and more efficient. In conclusion, banning
cars
and public transport from city centres in favour of bicycles would significantly reduce congestion, improve
air
quality, and promote healthier lifestyles. As discussed, these benefits make the proposal a positive change for urban environments.
Submitted by akzharkynzhamal on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Ensure that each paragraph clearly supports the main thesis, and make sure to elaborate on points to give a more comprehensive perspective.
task achievement
Add more relevant examples or statistics to strengthen your arguments and make them more convincing.
coherence cohesion
For greater coherence, consider adding transition phrases between paragraphs to smoothly guide the reader through your arguments.
coherence cohesion
The essay maintains a clear structure with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
task achievement
You clearly express your agreement with the statement and provide logical points to support your perspective.
task achievement
The essay covers different aspects like environment, public health, and urban life, offering a well-rounded argument.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: