Most artist earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, certain professions,
such
as artists
, have faced increasing challenges due to
declining public recognition of their work
. This
lack of appreciation often leads to insufficient income, making it difficult for artists
to support themselves and their families. As a result
, the question arises: should governments provide financial assistance to artists
? From my perspective, while
all citizens should receive equal support from the government
, funding for artists
should be carefully balanced with other societal priorities.
It is undeniable that public interest in art
has diminished in today’s fast-paced, technology-driven world. Many artists
struggle to meet their basic living costs, and their contributions are often undervalued by society. Advocates for government
support argue that art
has cultural and historical significance, serving as a reflection of society’s values and traditions. Therefore
, they believe funding artists
is essential to preserve these cultural assets for future generations. For instance
, government
subsidies for public art
projects or grants for struggling artists
can help maintain the continuity of artistic expression within a society.
On the other hand
, critics argue that government
funds should be directed toward sectors that benefit a larger proportion of the population, such
as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. These areas are vital for national development and directly impact citizens’ quality of life. Opponents also
contend that art
, like any other profession, should be self-sustaining. If an artist’s work
is valuable, they argue, it will attract private sponsorships or succeed in the market without the need for public funding.
Moreover
, advancements in technology have opened new avenues for artists
to generate income independently. The rise of digital platforms and innovations like NFTs (non-fungible tokens) has revolutionized how artists
can monetize their work
. For example
, some artists
have made millions by selling digital artwork through online marketplaces, proving that success in the art
world does not necessarily require government
intervention.
In conclusion, while
art
remains an important aspect of cultural identity, it should not be prioritized over other essential sectors when allocating public funds. Artists
who produce work
of real value can find opportunities through private sponsorships, digital platforms, or social media. Governments should focus on fostering an environment where all professions, including art
, have the tools to thrive independently, rather than providing direct financial assistance.Submitted by chawanat.pla on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Consider providing more examples or statistics to strengthen your arguments and make your essay more persuasive.
coherence cohesion
While the structure is commendable, attempt to ensure each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next, maintaining a clearer flow of ideas.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a clear introduction and conclusion, framing the argument effectively.
coherence cohesion
Well-structured paragraphs that address different aspects of the question comprehensively.
coherence cohesion
The main points are clearly supported, making the argument coherent and logical.
task achievement
The essay addresses the task by discussing both perspectives, showing a balanced view.
task achievement
The use of relevant contemporary examples, like digital platforms and NFTs, adds depth to the argument.