Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this. Do you agree or disagree

There is an ongoing debate over whether traditional

exams

are an effective way to assess a

student

's knowledge.

However

, regular assessment is not a sufficient

method

to evaluate the

student

's progress.

Although

formal examinations provide objectivity and reliability, I mostly disagree with

this

point of view for several reasons. Admittedly, one of the effective methods to test a pupil's performance is the ordinary examinations. One of the considerable reasons is that it offers a standardized

method

of assessment in which every

student

is checked based on the same subject and question.

This

means that it provides fair testing for performance comparison among students.

For example

, if students complain about their grades, thanks to just

a

Correct article usage

the

show examples

result of an exam, the teachers are more likely to justify the

student

's argument.

Further

justification is that formal

exams

test a

student

's ability to perform under pressure.

Thus

, it fosters some real-world perks, including time management, and quick thinking.

Nevertheless

, continual evaluation has a significant impact on the analysis of a pupil's knowledge. A primary reason is that it encourages children to learn regularly which is a much more effective

method

as opposed to traditional ones.

In other words

, continual assessment promotes better understanding through projects and practical application, which leads to storing information on being long-term.

For instance

, students do the tasks properly, and

this

tendency provides significant assimilation of the lesson . Another justification is that coursework and projects evaluate different skills that

exams

do not cover enough. As long as people have passed the exam through learning by heart, though the proper assignments might allow them to monitor not only their knowledge but

also

their persuading skills.

Hence

, these advantages convert continual evaluation to the best options. In conclusion, ordinary

exams

are an effective approach to analysing an individual's learning, even though proper ones are

also

a sufficient

method

due to

promoting assimilations.

Therefore

, I am of the opinion that continual

exams

analyze with a more widespread point of view.