Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. Therefore, working hours should be reduced To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technological advancements and automation have greatly reduced the need for manual
labor
in many industries. Change the spelling
labour
This
has led to the argument that working hours
should be reduced to reflect these changes. I agree with this
idea, as shorter working hours
can enhance employee well-being and efficiency. However
, it may not be practical in all contexts.
Technology has significantly improved productivity by automating tasks that were once time-consuming. For example
, robots in factories and AI-powered tools in offices now perform repetitive tasks with speed and precision. This
increased efficiency means that the same amount of work can be accomplished in fewer hours
, reducing the need for prolonged labor
. Shorter working Change the spelling
labour
hours
would allow employees to stay more focused and energized, ultimately leading to higher productivity during their shifts.
In addition
to improving efficiency, reducing working hours
can benefit employees’ overall
quality of life. In countries like Iceland, experiments with shorter workweeks showed that employees were happier and healthier, with more time for personal pursuits. Having additional leisure time enables workers to recharge, pursue hobbies, and spend quality time with their families, which can lead to improved mental health and job satisfaction. A motivated workforce benefits not only individuals but also
employers and society.
However
, shorter working hours
may not be feasible in all industries. Labor-intensive fields, such
as healthcare or agriculture, often require continuous human effort, making it difficult to reduce shifts. Similarly
, in developing economies, where productivity is directly tied to working hours
, reducing schedules could harm economic growth.
In conclusion, while
reducing working hours
is an effective way to balance technological progress and employee well-being, its implementation should depend on the specific needs of industries and economies. Proper planning can maximize its benefits without disrupting essential services.Submitted by checkmyessay9 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Continue including specific examples to strengthen your arguments, as they make your points more convincing.
task achievement
Further develop your conclusion with a more decisive statement on whether reduced working hours should be broadly implemented or considered selectively.
coherence cohesion
You may add transitional phrases between ideas to enhance the flow and coherence.
task achievement
The essay covers the topic from multiple angles, showing a deep understanding of the issue.
task achievement
Main points are clearly supported with examples and explanations, solidifying the response.
coherence cohesion
A logical structure is evident, with distinct paragraphs that address different aspects of the topic.
coherence cohesion
The essay includes a clear introduction and conclusion, providing a complete structure.