The table below shows the results of surveys in 2005, 2010 and 2015 about McGill University. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The table demonstrates answers from participants of a study about McGill University in 2005, 2010 and 2015.
Overall
, it is composed of 5 different categories which were marked by survey takers whether the university possesses listed resources or not, Linking Words
such
as education quality, library materials, services for students, selection of modules offered and sports facilities.
To look at details, it can be clearly seen that the library section was overtaking the other sections in all 3 periods since its value always exceeded 80 points, except in 2015. To give a Linking Words
further
explanation, it was done by student services which reached a mark of 95 in 2015, 81 in 2010 and 54 in 2005.
Linking Words
Additionally
, teaching quality and provided facilities were almost at the same value since both surpassed the rate of 64, Linking Words
however
, the former showed better results at about 75 mean value.
Unlike the above-mentioned sections, the range of modules was obviously suffering from a lack of votes, since it was less than 40 points each given year, making it the worst candidate among them.Linking Words
Submitted by shermadovs on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Introduction: The introduction is missing.
▼
Introduction: Change the first sentence in the introduction.
▼
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Introduction: The chart intro is missing.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "give" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "about" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: Use several vocabularies to present the data in the second paragraph.
▼