Too much emphasis is given for the education of students. More government money should be spent on free time activities for young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The government spends a lot of financial resources on the educational side of scholars,

while

it is considered that the after-school and spare time

activities

should gain the most financial attention of the government. High-quality education should be always examined

while

investing money in

students

and scholars, which can turn

students

into better specialists, and better specialists have a bigger impact on the world and society,

although

attending better after-school

activities

, a bigger desire to continue to educate awakens learners. On the one hand, good education for young people can be provided by just professional teachers with a lot of useful knowledge and doesn't have to require any extra facilities

while

educating, like the building design, minibars or coffee machines as it

is exist

Change the verb form

exists

show examples

,

therefore

, a lot of financial resources can be saved and spent on relaxational programs as restrooms, different kinds of sports or even a gym if it can be afforded. More contrarily, studying must be the number one priority for

students

as it significantly affects building their future life,

hence

, there is almost no need for massively considering after-school

activities

at all, as they can cause a negative impact on the productivity of the pupils.

For example

, disturbed

from

Change preposition

by

show examples

the educational process,

while

students

will wish to attend the

activities

, not being concentrated on the current schooling process.

To conclude

, I totally disagree with the statement that more money should be spent on spare time

activities

. I solidly believe, that

while

the government budget must competently be divided for each industry, education should always be the number one priority for scholars.