IELTS Writing Correction Service
Writing Samples
Band 7.5

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, businesses and the academy world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

#people #information #research #businesses #academy #world
✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
The debate surrounding whether to share
information
 freely or limit its dissemination is a contentious issue in scientific
research
,
business
, and
academia
.
While
 some argue that unrestricted access to
information
 fosters
innovation
 and collaboration, others contend that certain
data
 is too sensitive or valuable to be shared openly.
This
 essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own view that a balanced approach is essential. On one hand, advocates for open access emphasize the transformative potential of shared knowledge. In scientific
research
, freely sharing
data
 allows other researchers to build on previous findings, accelerating discoveries that can benefit humanity.
For instance
, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the rapid exchange of
research
data
 facilitated the development of vaccines and treatments in record time.
Similarly
, in
business
, the exchange of ideas and
data
 can spur
innovation
, foster competition, and improve efficiency. In
academia
, open-access publications democratize knowledge, ensuring that
information
 is available to a global audience, including those who cannot afford costly journal subscriptions.
On the other hand
, unrestricted
information
 sharing poses significant risks. In the
business
 world, intellectual property theft and the misuse of proprietary
data
 can undermine competitiveness and
innovation
. In scientific
research
, the release of sensitive
data
,
such
 as genetic or personal health
information
, could lead to ethical concerns and potential misuse.
Moreover
, in
academia
, the pressure to publish often results in the dissemination of unverified or incomplete
research
, which can mislead both the public and the scientific community. In conclusion,
while
 the open sharing of
information
 can drive progress and
innovation
, it is crucial to implement safeguards to protect sensitive and proprietary
data
. Collaboration in
research
,
business
, and
academia
 should be encouraged, but only under frameworks that ensure accuracy, confidentiality, and ethical integrity. A balanced approach, combining the benefits of openness with the necessary precautions, is the most effective way to harness the power of shared knowledge.
Submitted by i.nureddinn on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Consider providing more specific examples or case studies to further support your points.
task achievement
Make sure to address potential counterarguments or limitations in your conclusions.
coherence cohesion
The essay presents a clear introduction and conclusion, summarizing both sides of the argument effectively.
coherence cohesion
Logical structure is maintained throughout with well-organized paragraphs.
task achievement
The use of relevant specific examples, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, successfully illustrates your point.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: