Some argue that
of restricting
usage, we should discourage unnecessary
. I believe
contention possesses merit and should be pursued by the relevant authorities.
Critics argue that private cars are
a major source of
. Unlike
airplanesChange the spelling
show examples
, which carry hundreds of passengers at once, most cars contain just one or two people. In cities like Los Angeles, traffic congestion causes vehicles to idle for hours, producing tons of CO2 daily. Relatedly, urban sprawl encourages excessive
dependency, leading to chronic
and health issues
as asthma and lung disease. In fact, the World Health Organization (WHO) reports that over 4 million premature deaths per year are linked to
, much of it from vehicles. Given these facts, it seems unfair to blame
alone
ignoring the impact of
.
is particularly the case as
connect families and cultures in ways that cars never could. A grandmother in India can visit her grandchildren in Canada within a day. A student from Brazil can study abroad in Australia, broadening their educational and career opportunities. If
were severely restricted, it would not only damage economies but
isolate people from loved ones and life-changing experiences.
, it is undeniable that long-distance
burn an extraordinary amount of fuel. A single trip from London to Sydney,
, uses many thousands of
litersChange the spelling
show examples
of fuel, equivalent to what an average
would consume over many years. Airplanes release emissions directly into the upper atmosphere, where they linger longer and contribute disproportionately to climate change.
makes non-essential
a major contributor to carbon footprints. Many nations,
as Thailand
,
amassChange the form of the verb
show examples
over 20% of the GDP
comesCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
from
. If international tourists were discouraged from flying,
millions of jobs in hotels, restaurants, and transportation would disappear, it would encourage the growth of sustainable industries outside of
.
a pivot would be a negative in the short-term but yield long-term benefits not only for any nation dependent on
,Remove the comma
show examples
but more importantly, for the global health of the environment.
In conclusion,
contribute significantly to
and should be targeted to reduce emissions generally. Investing in better transport infrastructure, promoting electric vehicles, and implementing sustainable
policies would
help address the issue without harming economies or restricting essential
.