Recently, there has been an ongoing discussion about whether schools should be in charge of children's behavioural development beyond providing academic learning. From my perspective, I partially agree with
this
statement, as teaching kids good behaviours should be the priority of both schools and their families. The following are the reasons supporting my thesis.
On the one hand, education institutes should be held accountable for modelling positive demeanours as rote learning is insufficient for our pupils. Teaching them the means to regulate their emotions and be responsible for their actions can help them navigate in various grown-up settings. Without adequate support, students may not be able to manage their behaviours. There have been numerous examples in our community, where teenagers committed violence and were involved in anti-social events. Linking Words
This
results in detrimental impacts on society, which may cost more than developing a behavioural curriculum. Linking Words
Therefore
, implementing behavioural learning can serve as a cost-effective means to reduce these negative outcomes.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, good conduct cannot be formed within the schools, as parents and carers Linking Words
also
share an important part in preparing young learners to become responsible adults. They are the role models that our children are looking up to all the time. Linking Words
For example
, family members can explicitly reinforce values to respect others and help facilitate the positive mindsets taught in classrooms. Only when the school collaborates with parents to provide a consistent environment, can our students become well-rounded individuals.
In summary, it is obvious that establishing a behavioural curriculum in educational settings beyond the norms of improving students' academic results is beneficial for all. Linking Words
However
, the support to develop good manners will only be effective when it is consistently shared between the school and home environments.Linking Words
robbieyan666