The issue of whether nations should cultivate their own subsistence in order to feed the public and purchase fewer goods from other countries has become increasingly controversial in recent years. I completely disagree with
this
perspective because every crop cannot flourish on the same land and not importing rice and wheat can significantly decrease the opportunity to improve economically.
The most significant disadvantage is that every soil cannot produce the desired crop. Linking Words
This
is because growing a vegetable or a fruit requires the right weather which is not the same throughout the globe . Linking Words
For instance
, Heinz ketchup needs a specific type of tomato which is only grown in India . Linking Words
Therefore
, Linking Words
it is clear that
certain requirements cannot be fulfilled if every food is grown in the same place.
Linking Words
Furthermore
exporting goods and vice versa has provided tremendous growth economically. Linking Words
This
means that trading food is Linking Words
also
a business where the supplier gets paid for every unique crop Linking Words
that is
grown on their land which might unfortunately not be available in another country. A notable case is Europe where they import rice from Asia which has significantly increased the economy of developing countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan . Linking Words
Hence
importing improves the country's GDP.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that countries should import food as much as needed . The disadvantage of the typical soil and the decrease in economic growth confirms Linking Words
this
viewpoint. Government should take Linking Words
this
into account seriously and take necessary steps in order to mitigate these issues in futureLinking Words
bbonusha