The line graph shows variations in the weekly consumption of fish and three types of meat in one European country from 1979 to 2004.
Although
there were fluctuations, Linking Words
overall
, people in Linking Words
this
country consistently ate more meat than fish, and the general trend was to move away from Linking Words
beef
and lamb as Use synonyms
chicken
became Use synonyms
the
dominant in Change the article
apply
this
category.
In the first decade, Linking Words
beef
was consumed in significantly higher quantities than the other foods listed. Despite an initial sharp fall to approximately 175 Use synonyms
grams
, it Use synonyms
then
recovered reaching a high of close to 240 Linking Words
grams
per Use synonyms
week
. Use synonyms
However
, from 1989 onwards, Linking Words
beef
consumption fell almost continually, and by 2004 had almost halved. Lamb almost exactly mirrored Use synonyms
this
fluctuating trend, falling from Linking Words
second
highest Correct article usage
the second
initially
(at 150 Linking Words
grams
) to approximately 60 Use synonyms
grams
per Use synonyms
week
by the end of the period.
Use synonyms
In contrast
, Linking Words
chicken
climbed from less than 150 Use synonyms
grams
in 1979 and took the lead from around 1990 onwards. Interestingly, the increases in Use synonyms
chicken
corresponded with the declines in Use synonyms
beef
and lamb, and by 2002 Use synonyms
chicken
consumption had exceeded all previous rates, reaching approximately 260 Use synonyms
grams
a Use synonyms
week
, Use synonyms
although
Linking Words
this
peak was not maintained.
Fish was consistently eaten the least, beginning at around 60 Linking Words
grams
per Use synonyms
week
and Use synonyms
then
dropping to below 50 Linking Words
grams
. Use synonyms
While
it was the lowest, it remained relatively stable for the majority of the period.Linking Words
makemoneyizzy16