Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

In recent years, the popularity of high-risk
sports
Use synonyms
has sparked a debate about whether governments should prohibit
such
Linking Words
activities or allow individuals the
freedom
Use synonyms
to participate at their own risk.
While
Linking Words
some argue that these
sports
Use synonyms
are unnecessarily dangerous and should be restricted by law, others believe that personal choice should take precedence.
This
Linking Words
essay will examine both perspectives, and I will explain why I personally support the latter view. Supporters of banning dangerous
sports
Use synonyms
often emphasize public
safety
Use synonyms
and moral responsibility. They argue that activities like skydiving, base jumping, and mixed martial arts pose significant risks of severe injury or even death. From their perspective, governments have a duty to protect citizens from harm, even when that harm is voluntary.
For example
Linking Words
, statistics from the World Health Organization show that extreme
sports
Use synonyms
account for a considerable percentage of recreational injuries annually, placing additional pressure on healthcare systems.
Consequently
Linking Words
, advocates of
this
Linking Words
view believe that banning
such
Linking Words
sports
Use synonyms
would prevent avoidable tragedies and reduce societal costs.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, many believe that engaging in risky
sports
Use synonyms
should be a matter of personal
freedom
Use synonyms
. They contend that individuals are capable of assessing risks and making informed decisions about their own bodies.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, most extreme
sports
Use synonyms
require extensive training, strict
safety
Use synonyms
protocols, and often legal licensing, which helps reduce the dangers involved.
For instance
Linking Words
, mountain climbers are typically required to obtain permits and undergo technical preparation before attempting hazardous climbs like Mount Everest.
Therefore
Linking Words
, proponents of
this
Linking Words
perspective argue that rather than banning these
sports
Use synonyms
, governments should focus on ensuring they are regulated safely. Personally, I lean towards the second view because I believe in the importance of individual autonomy.
While
Linking Words
I understand the concerns regarding
safety
Use synonyms
, I think the right to choose one’s lifestyle and interests should not be limited by the government, provided that proper
safety
Use synonyms
measures are in place.
In addition
Linking Words
, many athletes find a deep sense of purpose, achievement, and identity through participating in
such
Linking Words
sports
Use synonyms
. Restricting them would not only suppress personal
freedom
Use synonyms
but
also
Linking Words
deprive society of the inspirational stories and cultural contributions that these athletes bring. In conclusion,
while
Linking Words
some people advocate for banning dangerous
sports
Use synonyms
in the interest of public
safety
Use synonyms
, others believe in preserving individual
freedom
Use synonyms
through regulation rather than prohibition. After examining both sides, it is clear to me that allowing people to make their own choices—
while
Linking Words
ensuring
safety
Use synonyms
standards—offers a more balanced and respectful approach to
this
Linking Words
complex issue.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

positive
The essay is well-structured, presenting a clear introduction, body paragraphs that explore both sides, and a strong conclusion that summarizes your perspective effectively.
improvement
To enhance the argument, you could provide more specific examples or statistics that connect more directly with the personal freedom aspect of extreme sports.
improvement
Consider varying sentence structures in some areas to increase the essay's dynamism. This can make your writing more engaging to the reader.
positive
Strong introduction and conclusion that frame the discussion well.

Support ideas with relevant, specific examples

Examples make your writing easier to understand by illustrating points more effectively.

Examples, if used properly, not only help you get higher marks for ‘Task Response’ but also for ‘Coherence’.

When giving examples it is best to put them after your main idea or topic sentence. They can be used in the middle of supporting sentences or they can be used to start a new sentence. There is no rule for where exactly to give examples in essays, logically they would come after your main idea/topic sentence or just after a supporting sentence.

Linking words for giving examples:

  • for example
  • for instance
  • to illustrate this
  • to give a clear example
  • such as
  • namely
  • to illustrate
  • take, for example
Topic Vocabulary:
  • severe injuries
  • fatalities
  • base jumping
  • bull running
  • extreme skiing
  • safeguard
  • well-being
  • regulating
  • avoidable harm
  • healthcare costs
  • burdening
  • personal freedom
  • autonomy
  • training
  • equipment
  • mitigated
  • personal satisfaction
  • mental health benefits
  • resilience
  • adventure
  • assess risks
  • public safety
  • unnecessary healthcare costs
  • outright bans
  • balanced approach
  • stringent safety standards
  • mandatory training sessions
  • adequately informed
  • safeguarding
  • public health
What to do next:
Look at other essays: