Some people say that there is too much harmful content on the internet. They say the only way to make the internet safe is for the government to censor the content of websites. To what extent do you think the government should control what information is available on the internet?

It is often argued that there is extremely dangerous content available on the internet, and the only viable solution to counter
this
Linking Words
problem is that the
government
Use synonyms
should ban these platforms. I totally disagree with
this
Linking Words
viewpoint because the citizens will face privacy breech
due to
Linking Words
unchecked surveillance by the
government
Use synonyms
authorities, and have no control over what type of material they want to post on websites.
Firstly
Linking Words
, because of the lack of appropriate cyber laws, there is no check and balance of
government
Use synonyms
officials who are monitoring these sites.
This
Linking Words
is to say, not only do these individuals have access to all the information of the public, but
also
Linking Words
these details can be exploited to gain financial gains.
Moreover
Linking Words
, these insights can be manipulated to pass strict regulations in order to take freedom of expression from the people of the country.
For example
Linking Words
, China's
government
Use synonyms
have imposed restrictions on their online websites which are managed 24/7 by IT experts.
Secondly
Linking Words
,
due to
Linking Words
misuse of cyber security rules, governments can manipulate the algorithms of social platforms, so that they can control the narrative.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, whenever different opinions are posted on social sites, they immediately get struck down by the firewall installed by the
government
Use synonyms
institutions.
For instance
Linking Words
, recently, the
government
Use synonyms
of North Korea has passed Cyber laws to manage the rational opinions published on online websites. In conclusion, I disagree with the claim that
Use synonyms
government
Correct article usage
the government
show examples
should have unchecked access to people's personal information so that they can use
this
Linking Words
data in their favour.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Ensure that your main points are thoroughly developed with clear explanations. For example, elaborating on how government surveillance can lead to loss of personal freedom would strengthen your argument.
coherence and cohesion
Try to use more cohesive devices (e.g., transition words and phrases) to create smoother connections between your ideas and paragraphs. This will enhance the flow of your essay.
task achievement
Clarify and provide more specific examples that directly support your arguments. For instance, including specific laws or events that illustrate government overreach could make your argument more compelling.
task achievement
The essay presents a clear personal opinion on the issue, effectively showing disagreement with government censorship.
coherence and cohesion
There is a logical structure with distinct paragraphs for each point, which aids in the overall organization.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Censorship
  • Freedom of expression
  • Hate speech
  • Misinformation
  • Extremism
  • Regulations
  • Cyberbullying
  • Self-regulation
  • Transparency
  • Vulnerable groups
  • Algorithms
  • Digital culture
  • Personal freedoms
  • Illegal content
  • Internet safety
What to do next:
Look at other essays: