The role of governments has become a subject of debate in contemporary society, as many individuals firmly support that supervision should strictly comply with industries in order to reach net-zero carbon emissions.
I understand that there might be some opposing arguments against
, I concur with
perspective for several reasons.
Primarily, harsh regulations on corporations benefit the climate significantly, especially when we are at a tipping point based on
currentCorrect article usage
show examples
global warming situation. There has been
a Correct article usage
show examples
rapid development in the past few decades, thanks to global industrialization.
,
development coincides with massive pollution at the same time.
, electric plants can be seen in almost every country, yet they
contribute to a great share of greenhouse gas emissions.
, stricter rules for limiting air pollution are vital to curb future emissions, so that companies will adhere to an environmentally friendly developing strategy.
, strict requirements will encourage companies to make adaptations and create an innovation stimulus. It will drive industries to source renewable
options, like using wind or solar
,
of coal and fossil fuels. In fact, renewable
is currently acting as a crucial factor in some regions, helping to reduce air pollution, creating job opportunities, and boosting the local economy. Take solar
. Solar panels are commonly applied to numerous houses in North America,
createsCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
thousands of jobs, and
reducingWrong verb form
show examples
their clients’ electrical bills by
Correct article usage
show examples
averagelyChange the word
show examples
40Change preposition
show examples
% based on EPA reports.
, more government interference
onChange preposition
show examples
changing
the Correct article usage
show examples
climate regulations culminates in
rationallyChange the word
show examples
production cost
increaseFix the agreement mistake
show examples
. In the world of business and finance, it is normal for a corporation who
prioritizesWrong verb form
show examples
profit over sustainable development and environmental protection. Considering our current living cost is already high enough, it makes more sense for a company to conduct their production in the most cost-effective way.
, cement manufacturers facing carbon taxes may
raise prices, as seen in Canada's 2024 industry reports. Regardless, actions need to be made to protect the Earth better, in order to provide a rewardable and livable future in the long run.
In conclusion,
there are some valid concerns that arise from corporations facing expenditure challenges, I maintain that tightening regulations by the government is conducive to a more sustainable future, and the benefits significantly outweigh the drawbacks.