The money spent by the governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, governments around the world have invested heavily in astronomical missions.

While

Linking Words

these programmes may lead to technological breakthroughs and international prestige, I firmly believe that public money should be prioritised for essential sectors like schooling and medical care. These sectors have a far more immediate and meaningful impact on citizens’ well-being. One strong reason to support the redirection of interplanetary budgets is that schools and hospitals form the foundation of any functional society. Spending billions on extraterrestrial expeditions diverts crucial funds away from basic public soft infrastructure including education and public health. Education empowers future generations with knowledge and skills and healthcare ensures a healthy population capable of contributing to the economy. Without sufficient investment in these areas, a country risks stagnation in human development.

For instance

Linking Words

, in many low-income nations, children still study in overcrowded classrooms with few qualified teachers.

According to

Linking Words

UNESCO, improving school infrastructure and teacher training can significantly increase literacy and employment outcomes. Clearly,

this

Linking Words

kind of investment delivers immediate and long-term benefits that space programmes cannot match. Another argument is that astronomical missions rarely address the urgent needs of the general public. Even though space explorations may offer scientific knowledge, they do not solve pressing issues

such

Linking Words

as illness, poverty, or unequal access to schooling. The majority of citizens are more concerned with access to affordable healthcare and quality schooling than with planetary exploration. Prioritising these basic provisions ensures that resources are directed toward problems that affect millions of people on a daily basis. A good example is Cuba, which has invested consistently in its public health system. Despite economic limitations, the country boasts high life expectancy and low infant mortality rates—results achieved not through advanced technology, but through consistent support for medical care. Redirecting interplanetary programme budgets could allow other nations to replicate the success. In conclusion,

although

Linking Words

astronomical missions have their intellectual and technological merits, I strongly believe that public funds are better spent on education and medical care. These foundational pillars address the core needs of society and produce immediate, measurable improvements in people’s lives. Governments should

therefore

Linking Words

prioritise the well-being of their citizens over distant, uncertain discoveries.