Some believe that the government should support artists like musicians, painters, and poets, while others argue that this is a misuse of funds. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There have been many discussions surrounding spending public funds on the arts or reserving them for essential services.

While

Linking Words

some consider cultural funding an unnecessary expense, I believe that supporting artistic programmes brings long-term benefits for both individuals and society. There are several reasons why some people believe the government should spend more on healthcare, education, and infrastructure, because these services directly improve people’s daily lives. The biggest reason is that taxpayers worry that too much money might be wasted on art projects.

For example

Linking Words

, in several northern provinces of Vietnam, many district hospitals still lack modern equipment and enough qualified doctors. If the government moved part of the cultural budget to these hospitals, thousands of residents could get better medical care right away.

Likewise

Linking Words

, after the COVID-19 pandemic, Indian leaders recommended reducing the scale of expensive cultural festivals so that more funds could be used for vaccination programmes and rural hospitals.

However

Linking Words

, I believe that government investment in art is a powerful way to preserve intangible cultural heritage and educate the younger generation. Traditional music, folk painting, and poetry are living lessons of history that textbooks alone cannot convey. When the state sponsors concerts or exhibitions, young people gain a vivid understanding of their nation’s past and develop a deeper appreciation for its identity. Looking more broadly, well-funded cultural events

also

Linking Words

strengthen national pride and social cohesion.

For instance

Linking Words

, during the recent celebration of the 80th anniversary of Vietnam’s reunification, a series of large-scale performances and exhibitions attracted enormous public participation and fostered a shared sense of unity and patriotism. In conclusion, state support for artists is not a misuse of funds but a wise investment. It preserves national traditions, enriches education, and nurtures solidarity among citizens. A society that values its culture alongside its infrastructure is far more likely to thrive in the long run.