The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table illustrates the proportion of students in a university who show good results in studying each course in 2000, 2005, and 2010 .

Overall

Linking Words

, the percentage of people who are likely to have better ratings is approximately equal for each year.

Firstly

Linking Words

, the table shows that aspects that the easiest and the most complicated aspects to pick up for students in 2000 were Print Resources and Range of modules offered , respectively.

Additionally

Linking Words

, in 2000 Range of modules offered and Electronic Resources had nearly the same proportion of successful people, 32/100 and 45/100 , respectively.

However

Linking Words

, in 2005

this

Linking Words

situation changed

and

Punctuation problem

, and

show examples

the difference between these two categories became more than 2 times, and in 2010 as well, so the Range of modules offered had more than 2 times fewer successful people since 2005.

Finally

Linking Words

, we can see that every aspect had not increased during the decade, except one, and the most stable was Building , which had exactly 77

percent

Change the spelling

per cent

show examples

in each year. Summarising all the above, the majority of categories do not tend to change, but there are always exceptions. For

this

Linking Words

one, it was ER that had 2 times less percentage of well-studying students than Print Resources , but after 10 years had the same percentage as PR.