Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and poluttion problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures fdo you think might be effective?

Many people believe that increasing the price of petrol is the best way to tackle growing
traffic
Use synonyms
and pollution problems. I partly agree with
this
Linking Words
idea because,
although
Linking Words
higher fuel costs can reduce car usage to some extent, other long-term measures are far more effective in addressing these issues.
To begin
Linking Words
with, raising petrol prices can discourage people from driving unnecessarily.
As a result
Linking Words
, commuters may start using public transport, carpooling, or even cycling to save money.
This
Linking Words
change in behaviour can help reduce both
traffic
Use synonyms
congestion and air pollution.
However
Linking Words
,
this
Linking Words
approach
also
Linking Words
has serious downsides.
For instance
Linking Words
, it can burden low- and middle-income individuals who rely on personal vehicles for work or daily activities.
Therefore
Linking Words
,
while
Linking Words
this
Linking Words
measure might be effective in the short term, it is neither fair nor sustainable in the long run.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, governments can adopt more practical and inclusive solutions.
Firstly
Linking Words
, improving the quality and accessibility of public transportation would naturally encourage people to use it
instead
Linking Words
of private cars.
Moreover
Linking Words
, promoting the use of electric vehicles through tax reductions and charging infrastructure could significantly cut emissions.
In addition
Linking Words
, urban policies
such
Linking Words
as car-free zones, better cycling paths, and encouraging remote work can help reduce
traffic
Use synonyms
pressure in cities. These combined actions, unlike fuel price hikes, address the root causes rather than just the symptoms. In conclusion,
while
Linking Words
increasing petrol prices may bring some temporary relief from
traffic
Use synonyms
and pollution, it is not a complete solution. Ultimately, a balanced approach — involving improved public transport, eco-friendly technology, and smart city planning — is the most effective and equitable way to deal with these modern urban challenges.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence
Be clear on one main note in each part. Make sure every paragraph shows one idea that links to the question.
content
Add a few simple facts or data to back up your points. This will make the argument stronger.
coherence
Use small link words to show cause and effect and to show contrast. This will help flow.
language
Check spelling and grammar, and keep long sentences short.
content
Good view and balance. It turns well to both sides of the issue.
structure
Clear structure with proper start and end. Good use of signpost words like 'To begin with', 'However', 'In conclusion'.
Use a variety of complex and simple sentences

You should use complex sentences in your writing, but it does not mean that you should try to make all of our sentences complex.

‘Complex’ sentences are not actually very complex; they are just two or more simple sentences put together. Putting them together makes the essay more coherent and cohesive.

Examples:

I really want to study but I’m too tired.

I wore a warm coat because the weather was cold.

If action is not taken soon on climate change, global warming will get worse.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: