Some people say that converting parks into residential buildings near the city centre can reduce the travelling time.
However
, Others oppose Linking Words
this
view. I agree with the latter view, because if most of the society lives nearby, more services Linking Words
such
as hospitals and schools will create heavy traffic.
Some argue that most offices are located in the downtown area, so workers travel to these places every day. Many employees drive long distances, which eventually leads to traffic; Linking Words
for
Linking Words
this
reason estimated arrival at the workplace is usually delayed. If the government approve the project to develop apartments close to the city, it will help the workforce to travel in a short time. Linking Words
For example
, in one of the Australian cities, Melbourne has implemented Linking Words
this
strategy to solve the traffic-related issue, Linking Words
as a result
country has less pollution and fewer accidents over the past 10 years.
Replacing natural spaces Linking Words
such
as parks will not help to decrease commuting hours. Linking Words
This
is to say that these gardens do not occupy a large amount of plot. Linking Words
Moreover
, any construction requires a lot of additional services from the government, Linking Words
such
as medical facilities, bus stations and community schools. Linking Words
This
will lead to roadblocks Linking Words
due to
vehicle movement. Linking Words
For instance
, in Toronto, the public always complains as they reach any location late, because the entire community population is travelling in Linking Words
such
a small area. Not only that during the pick hours, the situation gets worse.
Linking Words
To conclude
, some think that developing high-rise apartments helps in reducing transit, as most population lives nearby. But I believe there will be less effect if gardens are converted, because more vehicles lead to heavy traffic, even if the distance is short.Linking Words