The statement that
,Punctuation problem
show examples
individuals are not to be held responsible for the reversal of the
done to the environment,
governmental authorities and corporate companies should collaborate for
work. I believe that the idea could
proofReplace the word
show examples
to be counterproductive. I do not fully support the suggestion,
neitherCorrect word choice
show examples
do I deny the perks of it all. I will explain my opinion in the following paragraphs.
The question is not
,Punctuation problem
show examples
whether big conglomerate bodies
,Punctuation problem
show examples
or
a Correct article usage
show examples
single individuals should be
for the betterment of our surroundings. The question lies in
,Punctuation problem
show examples
either of them would be successful in doing so. Logically, these multiworker companies and the administrative
have way more resources and labour to
wo Verb problem
show examples
work with efficiency. Bigger problems like climate
changesFix the agreement mistake
show examples
and air quality can be better
mangedUse the right word
show examples
by these
organisationFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, as
itCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
will need
and information that are not accessible
forChange preposition
show examples
generalCorrect article usage
show examples
public.
, they have more connections which can lead to
aCorrect article usage
show examples
organised campaign for certain tasks, like area trash cleaning or tree planting for
betterCorrect article usage
show examples
atmosphere.
,
HavingFix capitalization
show examples
largeCorrect article usage
show examples
amountCheck wording
show examples
of people working together at the same time, for
aCorrect article usage
show examples
same
taskPunctuation problem
show examples
can give excellent results within a limited time frame
Punctuation problem
show examples
by luring workers to do so with the help of bonuses.
,Punctuation problem
show examples
it can
prove quite challenging. Making a crowd work in
aCorrect article usage
show examples
organised manner is no small feat.
,
to the environment is not a momentary problem
,Punctuation problem
show examples
it is a continuous threat. Having only a limited number
peopleChange preposition
show examples
working for a limited amount of time will be a temporary solution. In the long
can turn into
cycleCorrect article usage
show examples
of constant
and reversal.
,
is not
anCorrect article usage
show examples
personal or a group
. It is a duty of all
of Change preposition
show examples
those who dwell on it
,Punctuation problem
show examples
to keep it healthy and prosperous. It is true
,Punctuation problem
show examples
that a single person cannot make a huge difference to the environment, but
,Punctuation problem
show examples
if every single person starts working, it might actually make a change.
, cleaning their own yards, helping neighbours to keep it clean, planting trees in nearby areas whenever it is possible and permissible. Small actions can make bigger impacts.
In conclusion, government bodies and corporate companies should start working together for
reversal
andPunctuation problem
show examples
each person working towards
the Correct article usage
show examples
by themselves
,Punctuation problem
show examples
will not only cause the reversal but
cease the active
caused to
earthCorrect article usage
show examples
.