The proportions by which the government distributes money to various sectors are usually scrutinised by the people, and so it is a common question whether more money should be spent on healthcare rather than other areas.
While
the optimal well-being of the populace might be vital to the development of society, I totally disagree that the most funds should be allocated to healthcare. I would be focusing on how Linking Words
this
might lead to a higher probability of neglect and underdevelopment in other areas of concern and have a negative impact on the future.
Linking Words
Firstly
, utilising the bulk of monetary resources on the wellness system can cause other sectors to be neglected, which would surely lead to underdevelopment. Linking Words
For instance
, it is widely known that education and sports are globally recognised, and so these areas need to be sufficiently catered to. Linking Words
Thus
, it is apparent that ignoring other sectors will pose a risk of retrogression.
Linking Words
Secondly
, towing Linking Words
this
line will surely have adverse effects down the line, especially with education. Lacking adequate educational resources now would lead to a future substandard workforce and professionals , and Linking Words
this
is Linking Words
also
the same for sports. To illustrate, several countries presently have to depend on expatriates to work and train others Linking Words
beacuse
their citizens lack the knowledge. Correct your spelling
because
Therefore
, it makes it clear that fixating on one area of the nation would have debilitating effects eventually.
In conclusion, focusing on the healthcare system is a good idea , but it shouldn't be at the expense of sports and education to prevent underdevelopment and negative future problems. Monetary utilisation should rather be based on the society's specific needs.Linking Words