Many people believe that companies and individuals should pay to clean up the environment in proportion to the amount of pollution they have produced. Do you agree or disagree? This is the question then i provide a template of agree or disagree you also follow the brand descriptor also that i provided

It has been suggested that companies and individuals should be financially responsible for cleaning up the environment
according to
Linking Words
the amount of pollution they produce. In reality, not everyone agrees with
this
Linking Words
idea. In
this
Linking Words
essay
Add a comma
essay,
show examples
I will give a logical explanation for my choice, and I will argue that
this
Linking Words
system is fair and effective. There are many solid reasons that can compel me to go in favour of
this
Linking Words
statement. At the very outset, it ensures fairness because those who cause the damage must pay for restoring the environment.
For example
Linking Words
, if a large factory releases toxic waste into a river, it is unreasonable for ordinary taxpayers to cover the cost of cleaning the water.
In addition
Linking Words
,
such
Linking Words
a policy creates a strong financial incentive for companies and citizens to reduce their emissions and adopt greener technologies. To cite a good example, when some governments introduced heavy fines for plastic bags, many supermarkets quickly shifted to reusable bags
and
Punctuation problem
, and
show examples
customers changed their habits.
Last
Linking Words
but not least, requiring polluters to pay can provide governments with extra revenue to invest in environmental education and renewable energy projects.
For instance
Linking Words
, these funds could support public campaigns about recycling and subsidies for solar panels.
On the contrary
Linking Words
, there are a few arguments against
this
Linking Words
which
Punctuation problem
, which
show examples
I will address at
this
Linking Words
moment. First and foremost, some people claim that it is difficult to measure the exact amount of pollution produced by every individual or small business.
In particular
Linking Words
, they argue that monitoring emissions from millions of households would be complicated and expensive. Another point is that strict charges might increase the prices of products and services, which could hurt low‑income consumers. Particularly, higher production costs for factories might lead to more expensive electricity or food.
Nevertheless
Linking Words
, I believe that governments can focus mainly on large industrial polluters, where emissions are easier to track, and at the same time offer support or exemptions for vulnerable groups.
At the end
Linking Words
of the discussion, I would like to say that I
do
Verb problem
apply
show examples
strongly agree with the given statement. When companies and individuals pay to clean up the pollution they create, it promotes fairness, encourages more responsible behaviour, and provides essential funds to protect the environment for future generations.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task
Strengthen your main claim by making a clear statement in the intro and finish with a strong, simple rest of it in the conclusion.
coherence
Start each paragraph with a clear topic sentence that shows what the paragraph will say.
coherence
Link ideas with simple, clear connect words (for example: also, but, because, so).
language
Try to use plain words and short sentences; avoid long, complex lines that block the meaning.
task
Give one or two concrete examples and give numbers if you can, to show the idea.
content
Clear view on the issue and a direct start.
content
Good use of examples to back up ideas.
structure
Flow of ideas uses signs to show the path of thought.
Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general
What to do next:
Look at other essays: