Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that the government should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Try for free →
In recent years, there has been an ongoing debate as to whether
countries
Use synonyms
should allocate a significant amount of national funds to preserve
languages
Use synonyms
that are susceptible to extinction. Proponents of
this
Linking Words
view are firm in their belief that
this
Linking Words
approach can help nations enhance their cultural
heritage
Punctuation problem
heritage,
show examples
while
Linking Words
their opponents argue that governments should invest in providing better healthcare services, improving
education
Use synonyms
, and modernising existing infrastructure.
This
Linking Words
essay will elucidate both viewpoints before providing my own
perspectives
Check wording
perspective
show examples
. On the one hand, it is undeniable that funding the preservation of endangered
languages
Use synonyms
plays a pivotal role in cultural diversity. As
languages
Use synonyms
not only pass on information but
also
Linking Words
reflect the origins of people,
this
Linking Words
action is essential to ensure that nations treat all ethnic groups equally, thereby reducing social tension.
For example
Linking Words
, American Indians can still use their own
languages
Use synonyms
and demonstrate their cultural norms and traditions thanks to state-funded initiatives.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, preserving a language can help enrich the art and literature of diverse
countries
Use synonyms
, offering residents a mixture of artworks that can significantly attract more visitors, thereby leading to short-term economic growth.
Therefore
Linking Words
, preserving an endangered language is essential for social and cultural growth.
In contrast
Linking Words
, many policymakers believe that governments should prioritise developing other sectors. The primary reason is that
countries
Use synonyms
should heavily invest in healthcare services by replacing existing dilapidated medical equipment with cutting-edge technologies.
For example
Linking Words
, oncology departments rely on the latest equipment to treat patients more effectively, thereby increasing the likelihood of survival and reducing mortality rates.
Secondly
Linking Words
,
countries
Use synonyms
should allocate a large amount of national funds to
education
Use synonyms
. As more people have easier access to higher
education
Use synonyms
,
this
Linking Words
action not only considerably reduces unemployment rates but
also
Linking Words
ensures graduates better job security, ultimately serving as a key component of a rapidly growing economy. Equally important, a large amount of the government budget should be directed to modernising existing infrastructure.
This
Linking Words
approach provides citizens with an opportunity for convenient journeys by reducing the potential for traffic congestion.
Moreover
Linking Words
, expanding the existing railway network has a positive impact on business, as goods transportation becomes more cost-effective. In conclusion,
while
Linking Words
it is evident that funding the preservation of endangered
languages
Use synonyms
is essential for cultural heritage, I firmly believe that the government budget should be used to address more pressing issues
such
Linking Words
as improving healthcare services,
education
Use synonyms
and infrastructure.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
For task response, your opinion is clear, but explain a bit more why saving languages is less important than health, school, and roads.
task response
For task response, some ideas are good but a few are too general. Add one more clear and real example.
coherence and cohesion
For coherence and cohesion, your essay is easy to follow. To make it better, link some ideas more smoothly and avoid very long sentences.
coherence and cohesion
For coherence and cohesion, make sure each main point has one clear focus, because some parts include many ideas in one paragraph.
task response
For task response, you discuss both sides and give your own opinion clearly.
coherence and cohesion
For coherence and cohesion, your essay has a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.
coherence and cohesion
For coherence and cohesion, you use linking words well, such as 'on the one hand' and 'in conclusion'.
Word Count

IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.

A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.

Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: