Some people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. Others argue that private companies are better suited for conducting research because they have more resources and can innovate faster. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

✍️ Want to check your own essay?Try for free →
Scientific research is essential for technological advancement and improving the quality of life, yet opinions differ regarding who should be responsible for conducting and controlling it.
While
Linking Words
some argue that governments are better suited for
this
Linking Words
task, others believe that private companies have the resources and flexibility to achieve better results.
This
Linking Words
essay will discuss both perspectives. On the one hand, government involvement in scientific research is essential to ensure that it serves the public interest. Governments are more likely to invest in areas that may not be immediately profitable but are very important for social interest,
such
Linking Words
as public health and environmental issues. In
fact
Add a comma
fact,
show examples
many lifesaving drugs and treatments have been developed by public funds.
In addition
Linking Words
to that, state control can impose strict ethical standards and prevent misuse of scientific advancements.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, the participation of the private sector in scientific research can bring innovation and efficiency.
Due to
Linking Words
the high competition in the private market, the results can be obtained faster and be more financially rewarding. The Pharmaceutical and IT industries are good examples of
this
Linking Words
fast-evolving reality, mainly backed by private enterprises. In my opinion, private companies can play a crucial role in stimulating a certain speed and innovation. The government can contribute by ensuring stable and secure progress,
for example
Linking Words
, by providing equal access to resources and establishing long-term strategies in the public interest. A balanced collaboration between the two sectors can be ideal for public benefit.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Make your own view more clear from the start and keep it the same to the end.
task response
Add one or two more clear and real examples to support each main idea.
task response
Explain your main points a bit more so the reader can see why they are true.
coherence and cohesion
Use linking words more carefully. Some links are good, but a few ideas can flow more smoothly.
coherence and cohesion
Keep each body paragraph focused on one main idea, then develop it with a clear reason and example.
coherence and cohesion
Check small grammar points like articles and word form because they can make meaning less clear.
task response
You answered both sides of the topic and gave your own view.
coherence and cohesion
Your essay has a clear intro, two body parts, and an ending.
coherence and cohesion
Most ideas are in a logical order and easy to follow.
task response
You use some good topic words like public interest, ethical standards, and innovation.
Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general
What to do next:
Look at other essays: