The graph line illustrates the percentage of four various materials that were reused during the period from 1982 to 2010, measured by percentage.
Overall
, it can be clearly seen that there was a fluctuation of paper& Linking Words
cardboard
trends , Use synonyms
whereas
a big difference is seen between aluminium cans and plastic in 2010. Linking Words
In addition
, there is a similarity between paper & Linking Words
cardboard
and glass containers in 2010.
Use synonyms
To begin
with, the recycling Linking Words
rate
of paper & Use synonyms
cardboard
increased slightly from nearly 65 per cent in 1982 to around 70% in 1986 of recycling Use synonyms
rate
of selected, followed by a modest decline to around 65% in 1990. After that, it soared from approximately 65 Use synonyms
percent
in 1990 to approximately 80 per cent in 1994, Change the spelling
per cent
subsequently
itexperienced agradual drop , ending from 1994 to 2010 at around 70 per cent of the recycling Linking Words
rate
.
Use synonyms
Moreover
, there is a big difference between aluminium and plastic cans.Linking Words
For example
, in 2010, the recycling Linking Words
rate
for selected materials of aluminium was much higher than Use synonyms
cans plastic
, around 70% and about 10% of the Correct word order
that of plastic cans
rate
.
The percentage of paper& Use synonyms
cardboard
and glass containers in the recycling Use synonyms
rate
for selected materials is extremely similar in 2010, at 70% and 60%, respectively.Use synonyms