There are many nations in the world which mandate military service for the young population after they turn 18. Even though it is considered by many civilisations to be a duty with historical background and meaning, I completely disagree that it is a good idea to adopt
this
system not only for men, but Linking Words
also
for women.
Linking Words
Firstly
, compulsory military services lead to career breaks for youngsters since the duration is generally up to 18 months, which period depends on the governmental rules. Linking Words
For instance
, in Turkey, male graduates either have to become soldiers and Linking Words
thus
possess a gap on their CV or pay an extreme amount of money not to serve. Linking Words
Thus
, they are forced to make a decision on whether they can compensatefor asignificant interference in terms of their academic and professional careers , or they can start their careers with a debt to the government.
Linking Words
Additionally
, many losses happen during military service; Linking Words
consequently
, it can result in a massive disappearance of individuals with bright futures. Linking Words
For example
, the USA has been experiencing a large number of deaths of its own citizens in Vietnam, Iraq, and Iran for many years. Linking Words
Due to
war missions, responsibilities in danger zones, and fights against terrorism, it is possible to see a decrease in the total number of those who are able to assist in creating the national fundamentals, Linking Words
such
as scientists, engineers, teachers, and many more.
In conclusion, it is a more efficient solution to make military service optional for countries, Linking Words
instead
of mandatory. In Linking Words
this
way, Authorities will have the opportunity to send citizens who are patriotic enough, desire the utmost discipline, and can train themselves technically for martial assignments.Linking Words