Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and polution probloms. To what extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures might be effictive ?

6.5 / 9
✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
In recent years,
traffic
Use synonyms
congestion
Use synonyms
and air pollution have become serious problems in
mant
Correct your spelling
many
cities. Some
people
Use synonyms
argue that raising
petrol
Use synonyms
prices
Use synonyms
is the most effective way to address these issues.
Although
Linking Words
higher fuel
prices
Use synonyms
may discourage
people
Use synonyms
from driving,
i
Fix capitalization
I
show examples
disagree that
this
Linking Words
is the best solution, as improving public
transport
Use synonyms
and promoting environmentally friendly
vehicles
Use synonyms
could be more
affective
Use the right word
effective
show examples
.
Body paragraph 1
To begin
Linking Words
with, increasing
petrol
Use synonyms
prices
Use synonyms
may reduce the number of
vehicles
Use synonyms
on the road, but it could
also
Linking Words
create financial difficulties for many
people
Use synonyms
.
For example
Linking Words
, individuals who live in rural areas often depend on private cars because public
transport
Use synonyms
is limited.
As a result
Linking Words
, they would have no choice but to pay higher fuel costs, which could put additional pressure on their household budgets.
Furthermore
Linking Words
, higher
petrol
Use synonyms
prices
Use synonyms
may increase transportation costs for businesses, potentially leading to higher
prices
Use synonyms
for everyday goods.
Therefore
Linking Words
,
this
Linking Words
approach could negatively affect the economy without significantly reducing
traffic
Use synonyms
congestion
Use synonyms
.
Body paragraph 2
Instead
Linking Words
of relying mainly on higher fuel
prices
Use synonyms
, governments should invest in more efficient public
transport
Use synonyms
systems.
For instance
Linking Words
, providing affordable and reliable buses and trains would encourage more
people
Use synonyms
to leave their cars at home.
This
Linking Words
could reduce both
traffic
Use synonyms
congestion
Use synonyms
and harmful emissions.
In addition
Linking Words
, governments could offer financial incentives for electric
vehicles
Use synonyms
and expand charging infrastructure.
Although
Linking Words
electric cars cannot completely solve
traffic
Use synonyms
problems, they can help reduce air pollution, particularly in urban areas. These measures would provide more sustainable solutions in the long term.
Conclusion
In conclusion,
while
Linking Words
increasing
petrol
Use synonyms
prices
Use synonyms
may discourage some
people
Use synonyms
from driving, I believe it is not the most effective approach. Improving public
transport
Use synonyms
and encouraging the use of cleaner
vehicles
Use synonyms
would be more practical and sustainable ways to tackle
traffic
Use synonyms
congestion
Use synonyms
and pollution.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task response
You answer both parts of the question clearly. You state your view, explain why higher petrol costs may not work well, and give other ways to help.
Task response
To make your view even stronger, add one more clear detail about how better buses or trains can cut the number of cars. For example, say that fast, low-cost trains can help people travel to work without driving.
Task response
Your examples fit your main ideas. The example about people in rural areas is useful. You could also add a short real-life example for electric cars or bus lanes.
Coherence and cohesion
Your essay is easy to follow. The first body part shows the limits of higher petrol costs, and the next body part gives better ways.
Coherence and cohesion
Your link words are clear and natural, such as “For example”, “As a result”, “Furthermore”, and “In addition”. Try not to use too many link words in one paragraph; make sure each one adds a clear step in the idea.
Coherence and cohesion
The start and end work well together. In the end, you repeat your main view and the two main ways to help. You could make the last sentence a little stronger by saying that these ways work for both traffic and air quality.
Task response
Your main view is clear from the start: higher petrol prices may help, but they are not the best answer.
Task response
You give useful reasons for your view, including the cost for people who need cars and the possible rise in the cost of goods.
Coherence and cohesion
Each paragraph has one main job, and the ideas move in a clear order from problem to other answers.
Coherence and cohesion
The final paragraph gives a clear, short summary of your view and main points.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: