The only effective way to reduce air pollution in major cities is to make all public transport completely free for citizens. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

8.5 / 9
✍️ Want to check your own essay?Write on this topic →
Introduction
It is sometimes suggested that abolishing fares on buses, trams, and trains is the single solution capable of cleaning the air in large urban areas.
While
Linking Words
I accept that free travel would tempt some motorists to leave their cars at home, I largely disagree with the claim that it is the only answer because pollution has several sources and a zero-fare policy addresses just one of them.
Body paragraph 1
Admittedly, the case for zero-fare travel is not without merit. The most obvious point is that cost is a genuine barrier for low-income commuters, so removing it could fill half-empty buses and take thousands of vehicles off the roads each morning. In Morocco,
for instance
Linking Words
, ridership on the Casablanca tram rose sharply during a month without charges, which produced a measurable drop in traffic along its route. Closely linked to
this
Linking Words
is the social benefit, since cheaper mobility gives poorer families access to jobs and hospitals they could not previously reach.
Body paragraph 2
Nevertheless
Linking Words
, treating fares as the whole problem ignores where most of the dirty air comes from. The most important reason is that factories, construction sites, household heating and old diesel lorries emit a far larger share of harmful particles than private cars do, and none of these would change if a ticket became free. Rabat,
for example
Linking Words
, still suffers from thick winter smog despite its modern tram network, and,
consequently
Linking Words
, officials have had to restrict industrial burning as well.
Moreover
Linking Words
, people who value comfort and speed will keep driving unless parking charges rise and cycle lanes improve. In my view,
therefore
Linking Words
, complimentary travel is one useful tool among many rather than a cure in itself.
Conclusion
In conclusion, scrapping fares can reduce congestion and help the disadvantaged, yet it leaves the main sources of pollution untouched. On balance, cities need a combination of cleaner industry, stricter vehicle standards and better transport, not a single measure.

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site's author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
State your view even more directly in the first paragraph. For example, say that free public transport can help, but it cannot be the only way to cut air pollution.
task response
Some examples sound very exact, but they are not explained in much detail. Either give a little more detail about how the example proves your point, or use a more general example.
task response
You could also say that free travel may need more money from the city. This would make your answer more complete, because buses and trains still need staff, fuel or power, and repairs.
coherence and cohesion
Your ideas are in a clear order: first the good side, then the limits, then your final view. Keep this plan in future essays.
coherence and cohesion
A few sentences are quite long and hold many ideas. Split them into two shorter sentences at times, so the reader can follow your point more easily.
coherence and cohesion
Use linking words carefully. Words such as “for example”, “however”, and “therefore” work well here. Do not add too many links when the meaning is already clear.
task response
You answer the full question and keep a clear view from start to end: free travel can help, but it is not the only answer.
task response
Your main points are well chosen. You explain both fewer cars on the road and other causes of dirty air, such as factories, heating, and old lorries.
coherence and cohesion
Each paragraph has one main job, and the final paragraph clearly brings your key ideas together.
coherence and cohesion
The move from the possible good side to the limits is smooth and easy to understand.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: