Recent advancements in cognitive computing have radically improved Machine translation technology (MT). Some people believe, MT can never be, as fast nor accurate as Human translation. I disagree with this point, and in this essay, I will put forth my views on how MT is slowly becoming better than a Human translation with suitable examples.
It is true that there have been great advances in technology over the last forty years. For example / For instance the use of mobile phones and e-mail communication are common these days. However, machines that translate from one language to another are still in their early stages.
Improve your IELTS writing score within two weeks
Hundreds of algorithms will assess your writing according to 4 evaluation criteria. Writing9 helps you find the weak points of your essay and make it flawless.
There are always certain pros and cons to each side and this topic is no different than that. Nowadays, the machines are taking over most of the jobs. We are losing our jobs to the machines, as it works more conveniently and quickly. However, there is also another side of this debate. Let us discuss this thoroughly below.
In the modern era, an increase in the number of Machine translations is a major concern across the countries. With each passing day, human spend a lot of time while dealing with translations that really made their lives complicated, there is enough chance for improvement. A huge number of people do react differently because of ample freedom. The present essay will discuss the topic in a broader manner.
There is a line of thinking that considers the machine translation (MT) slower than humans way to do the same function. In addition, they believe that machines cannot substitute the human being ability in the future. In my opinion, men are able to translate simultaneously with more accuracy than MT.
There are so many languages used in the world. But due to various reasons like business or travel we need translation of language. Some assert that machine translation can never compete with human translation. I disagree with this statement and I will give some reasons and examples to prove my point.