Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the global relationship always brings benefit
for
Suggestion
of
all the
countries especially
Accept comma addition
countries, especially
the poor countries.
Although
these countries often receive financial aid from richer countries, the poverty is not actually solved. For that, it is sometimes argued that developed countries should change another
way
if they want to help the areas, which are
under-developed
relating to societies in which capital needed to industrialize is in short supply
underdeveloped
, and I totally agree with
this
view.
First
of all, an amount of
money
is not the solution that poor
counties
a politically organized body of people under a single government
countries
are facing
Suggestion
are faced
will be faced
with
such
as poverty. It means that the
money
will run out if the resident of these countries know how to earn it by producing the goods and services. The government cannot give food or accommodation everyday thank
to
Suggestion
for
using
this
money
. In fact,
this
solution just only suitable for a short term but the thing, which these counties need, is a key for financial troubles in long term.
Furthermore
, rich countries should change another
way
by teaching poorer countries the
way
to produce market. In
particularly
Suggestion
particular
, some chief executive officers from
developed
Suggestion
developing
countries should flight to these counties and teach them about sales, marketing, produce products.
The poor
Suggestion
Poorer
countries can study step by step about
economy
Suggestion
the economy
of the world. From that, they can find the answer
for
Suggestion
to
the financial difficulties.
Therefore
, a plan for
new financial solution
Suggestion
the new financial solution
is more beneficial than an amount of
money
sending from
developed
Suggestion
developing
countries. In conclusion, I believe that the monetary assistance should be changed by another
way
because it is not suitable in
long term
Suggestion
the long term
.
Therefore
, other types of support should be given to these countries.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Read more in the eBook

The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »

* free ebook for Premium users

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users