Some people think that it is more effective for student to study in groups, while other believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinions differ as to whether it is better for students to study in groups or individually. From my perspective, it is impossible to say which is better, since it pretty much depends on the learners’ preferences and characteristics. One clear advantage of studying alone to busy people is the fact that they have total control over their study schedules. Since each student has different interests, tasks and concerns, their timetables also greatly vary from one another. Studying alone, therefore, enables them to plan a schedule that works best for them. This is particularly advantageous for students who have part-time jobs, or those who have to take care of smaller family members. Studying alone also benefits those who have special needs. Personalised learning gives slower students more time and efforts to be more focused on what they have yet to understand when they are at school. Faster learners, on the other hand, are able to challenge themselves with, say, trickier maths problems, when they are already done with their daily homework. However, there are some kinds of learners who are more inclined towards studying in groups. Learners who have good interpersonal skills may find group study more compatible. They find learning most comfortable and effective when talking to people, listening to how they response, and engaging in activities that require teamwork. Also, those who usually procrastinate also reap many benefits from this learning strategy. Since studying in a group requires a certain degree of responsibility, it gives people who are not really self-disciplined motivation and efficiency. Knowing that people around you are also studying may, to a certain extent, reduce personal distraction and boost study effort. In conclusion, I believe that each learning strategy has its own merits. Whether group study or individual study works better is greatly dependent on students’ learning styles and needs.
Submitted by People’s life expectancy in the 21st century has been rising on an unprecedented scale. As a result, policymakers are now considering extending the working age for old people. Prolonged life is, on the one hand, a welcome change for many individuals, yet I believe this is completely not a good idea for old people to continue to work due to several reasons related to their deteriorated work performance and capability to adapt to new technologies. Breakthroughs in medicine and heightened awareness of nutrition are the two key factors leading to longevity. For example, nanotechnology, with tiny robots being injected into patients’ body and mending all their damaged organs, are believed to the one of the secrets to obliterate any currently incurable diseases such as cancer. Additionally, people nowadays are better aware of the importance of a good diet, and such wise consumption can ensure good health and consequently extended age. However, extending people’s working age can be a catastrophe to both senior citizens and companies. The majority of people at the age of 65 or over, especially in developing countries, are unable to maintain the same degree of performance as their younger counterparts. This would eventually give rise to many unwanted repercussions that affect the company’s overall profits and the personal life of the aged workers as well. Also, the fast-paced life requires quick adaption and adjustments to new technology, and this is something that the elderly may never be on par with the younger ones. It is not an overstatement to say that it is a torture to work in a place where you are both physically and technologically inferior to your younger co-workers. In conclusion, my firm conviction is that old people should not be involved in work any longer than their designated retirement age now. If the need for workforce is urgent, old people can, to a certain extent, work as consultants or mentors rather than the main labor force. 30 minutes – 323 words – computer-delivered on