The government should lower the budget on the arts in order to allocate more money to education. To what extent do you agree?

Nowadays, some people believe that governmental authorities need to lessen their expenditure on the arts so as to devote more money to the process of learning. In this essay, I will clarify why I agree with this point of view. Spending money on the arts is not a matter of paramount importance in contrast to education. This is because the arts, albeit valuable, are not one of the cornerstone factors of the country’s development. A particularly salient example of this is the educational system in Egypt, in which a lot of financial resources are allocated to the construction of theaters and maintenance of precious paintings, while at the same time, not offering ample amount of money for upgrading the learning amenities such as universities and institutes. Therefore, dedicating gigantic amount of governmental budget to the arts should not be one of the top priorities of the authorities. In addition, paying attention to thriving the educational system is vastly advantageous for many reasons. Firstly, learning is pivotal for boosting the moral and intellectual capacity of children. This is because that if it had not been for well-developed educational facilities, there would have been colossal spread of ignorance and escalated crime rates. Furthermore, the more prosperous is the learning process, the more creative future generations will be, thus, sharpening their imagination skills with more proclivity to become outstanding artistic figures. So, spending money on education is investment for the arts indirectly. In conclusion, despite the fact that the arts are appreciable, I believe that more money should be directed to financing education services.
What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users