Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts, and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

It is well known that governments tend to spend huge amounts of

money

on different projects, some more important than others, but when it comes to

arts

Suggestion

the arts

, some people say that those

money

Suggestion

monies

should be redirected to more important areas. I disagree with

this

statement, as

arts

Suggestion

the arts

is

Suggestion

are

a very important part of people's life.

First

of all, the concept of creating

art

is

a

Suggestion

an

activity people do since they started painting their cave walls, maybe even before that era, and they should never stop, because it is one of the things that makes us humans.

Moreover

, no other creature on

this

planet is capable to

interract

act together or towards others or with others

interact

conciously

with awareness

consciously

with the

evironment

the totality of surrounding conditions

environment

in

such

a way as to create

breath-taking

tending to cause suspension of regular breathing

breathtaking

goods.

For example

, the sculpture of David, known all over the world, cost the

goverment

the organization that is the governing authority of a political unit

government

big amounts of

money

at that time, but now you can't put a price on it, it's priceless.

On the other hand

, we can

easealy

with ease ('easy' is sometimes used informally for 'easily')

easily

see why some people think that the arts budget should be

spend

Suggestion

spent

on some other projects,

art

being so expensive, a lot more things could be done with those amounts of

money

.

Thus

, they think, especially in poorer countries, where the basic needs of the people are

barrely

only a very short time before

barely

met, that with

thouse

plural of that

those

these

funds the

goverment

the organization that is the governing authority of a political unit

government

should build schools, more roads, invest in the healthcare system, and so on.

That is

partially true, they should spend

on infrastructure more

Suggestion

more on infrastructure

than on arts, trying to take care of the people's needs

first

, but have a lowered

art

budget if the case requires it.

On the other hand

, we can't contest that

art

is a

bussiness

a commercial or industrial enterprise and the people who constitute it

business

where there can be benefits for everybody, the government, the people, and

finally

the individual with interest in

arts

Suggestion

the arts

.

Furthermore

, not everybody is the same, some people have more affinity to arts than others, but the ones that do need a job can't live if there is no

money

to invest in

this

type of

activitiy

any specific behavior

activity

activities

. Not to mention that,

art

galleries

cand

in order to; used instead of "to", especially after try, come, go

and

produce a decent income to the

goverment

the organization that is the governing authority of a political unit

government

at any point in time,

expecially

to a distinctly greater extent or degree than is common

especially

in the future. In conclusion

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

can firmly say that

i

refers to the speaker or writer

I

disagree with people saying that

money

spend on

arts

Suggestion

the arts

should be

spend

Suggestion

spent

on more important things, because

art

is

unexplicable

in an unexplained or unexplainable manner

inexplicably

beautiful and we are

atracted

direct toward itself or oneself by means of some psychological power or physical attributes

attracted

to it, it makes us humans, and than that, it produces huge amounts of income to everyone

envolved

connected by participation or association or use

involved

.