Money should be spent on creating new public buildings such as museums or town halls rather than renovating the existing ones.
 To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is the conundrum for the

government

that where to spend money, building new public facilities

such

as museum and town halls or to renovate existing ones. As per my view, preserving and maintaining ancient public places is more needful than availing new public building. Two primitive reasons for

this

are: Renovate existing places is

cost-effective solution

Suggestion

a cost-effective solution

for many world’s governments, Old places often have

it’s

of a thing, of it; possessive form of "it"

its

own historical values.

To begin

with, redeveloping museums and town halls proved to be a cheaper solution than building new public places from scratch, for the developing countries’

government

. Once these places renovated properly, they look like a new one and even within allocated budget.

For instance

, the Brazilian

government

has renovated all the monuments of the Rio city

instead

public demand for setting up new recreational facilities, because of steep financial resources. The

government

contemplated that the actual spending is only 3 percent compared to the plan of creating new public buildings.

Additionally

, republicans

also

admiring

this

step from the

government

afterward.

This

example clarifies that why spending on preservation of the existing places is so important, in terms of limited financial options.

Consequently

, old places have a strong connection with respective countries culture and history. Many world’s cities are known as heritage cities by it’s ancient buildings. In

this

way,

people’s name

Suggestion

a person’s name

person’s name

the person’s name

and history attached

with

Suggestion

to

those places and

thus

emotions is

also

the key factor for the

government

to put more focus on reinventing existing places than creating new ones, even if the

government

is financially capable to build new places.

For example

, the Indian

government

believed in maintaining

old building

Suggestion

old buildings

the old building

an old building

in Delhi as it depicts Indian culture and history of the popular personalities. Many of the city’s monuments named after famous national persons, kings of old time, and politicians. In fact, though, the Indian

government

is too financially healthy to build new places, the

government

prefers to renovate old ones. To conclude, by describing both the points I can say that it is not only necessary for countries’

government

to save their financial resources in order to preserve old

places but

Accept comma addition

places, but

also

important for them to preserve historical values and culture of their own country.