Some people believe that in order to give opportunities to new generation, companies should encourage high level employees who are older than 55 to retire. Do you agree or disagree? Why?

It is true that nowadays, a lot of enterprises encourage qualified old employees to retire to make up room for the young ones. In my opinion, this decision is absolutely misguided. There are some indisputable advantages of having older people working for companies. The main benefit is that they have a huge amount of experiences which have been accumulated during over a decade. Thanks to their life capital and experiences, they will have enough abilities and skills to face harsh responsibilities and solve awkward problems in their firms as well. Another perk is most of old workers have strong professional networks and client networks because they have built work relationships and cooperated with a lot of counterparts for a long time. Therefore, they are likely to not only help companies have chance to affiliate with others but also increase selling products of firms in which they are working for. In contrast, young people tend to lack much knowledge for their career path compared to old people. Firstly, they lack of skills which are necessary for their jobs and the relationship with colleagues. Thus, they are possible to not complete all assigned tasks and fail to handle pressure. For example, many young employees quit because of the inability to cope with the cramped workload and work condition. Secondly, young people lack of stability because they have no clear vision of their career. They are willing to switch to other companies which offer them better opportunity without thinking about their old one. This will be a huge loss to the organization since their effort and time invested in training for young workers are not profitable. In conclusion, I firmly believed that employers should keep their proficient old workers to contribute to their companies and help them prosper.
Submitted by The expense of living is higher in developed nations and it affects directly to citizens and society. In this essay, I will express this issue and some resolves. People living in the US or any European country would face daily expensive cost and it affects directly to every citizen and society. Firstly, It forces adult individuals to work in most of the time and takes away enjoyable moments in their lives. For instance, a direct salesman in car dealers usually conducts their tasks from 6 am to 8 pm to maximum volume of sales and meet daily costs. Secondly, this fact creates a bunch of homeless people, who come from both white-collar and blue-collar workers. In Silicon Valley, teachers, bankers or staffs of governments live in track, which is normal images that local people see every day. The best way is that governments and corporation must act together. In the US, authorities in some province encourage real estate companies to build more houses and apartments, they act to remove and shrink terms, conditions in certain sectors. Some also decrease business tax massively to attract large conglomerate. It results in thousands of apartments, house, which appear at the edge of cities or state. Let’s take Google corporation is an example, they proactively associated with state government and sponsor to provide low-cost houses in Silicon Valley for their employees and valley citizens. High cost in developed countries and other issues always happens in different contexts, hence individuals, corporation, and authorities must act and take their responsibility in life and our society. on
What to do next:
Try other services:

All the services are free for Premium users

Recent essays: