Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching with the technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be online. To what extent do you agree or disagree? give your own opinion

. Students have traditionally been taught in large

lecture

halls.

However

, the

plausablilit

apparent validity

plausibility

y of

this

method of teaching is under scrutiny as online

lecture

delivery is increasingly being lobbied for. In my opinion, online teaching is a better alternative because it is

time

efficient as well as convenient for the students.

To begin

with, students face

time

constraints for studies on a daily basis.

This

is because they have to travel long distances to and from educational institutions in order to be taught in

lecture

halls.

This

travel

time

,

however

, can be saved if lectures are delivered through the Internet.

For instance

, a student can be spared 2 hours of travel

time

from Peshawar to Swabi, which can be used for homework purposes.

Therefore

, online delivery of lectures is beneficial for the students.

Similarly

,

aquisitio

the act of contracting or assuming or acquiring possession of something

acquisition

n of lectures through the Internet is highly convenient for the students. They can,

for example

,

rewatc

look attentively

watch

h a

lecture

several times until they fully understand the topic.

In addition

to

this

, students can take a break from the

lecture

and resume at a later, suitable

time

. Traditional way of lecturing,

however

,

eliminat

Suggestion

eliminates

e these benefits and

subsequently

, put unnecessary stress on the students.

Therefore

, the method of online delivery of lectures is justified against traditional ways. In conclusion, educating students over the internet is indisputably better than older ways of teaching. Educational institutes in the future must move on from teachings in the

lecture

halls and initiate online classes.