Modern building change the character and appearance of towns and cities. The government should insist that new buildings be built in traditional styles to protect cultural identity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Over the

last

decade, there has been a change in the design and appearance of buildings around the world. Some people believe that it should be constructed in a traditional style to preserve their cultural heritage. In my opinion, I completely disagree with

this

view because

culture

is dynamic, and would discourage new innovations.

culture

Suggestion

Culture

is not static. The current look of structures in the countryside is not the same centuries ago. Houses were built with clay or plant leaves, and today it is with cement or bricks.

For example

, in 1884 houses

but

(used of soaps or cleaning agents) having a substance (an abrasive or filler) added to increase effectiveness

built

in rural areas were made of mud and bamboo. If we prevent the building with modern designs we will be limiting our abilities to develop

culture

, and

this

would hinder growth. To encourage new ideas, people should be allowed to construct buildings to have a modern appearance.

Also

, the new look helps us to differentiate the cities from the rural areas.

Moreover

, these innovations result from tackling challenges face the some regions.

For instance

, in Lagos, skyscrapers are built to help overcome the limited land available. And if the introduction of new technology

were discouraged

Suggestion

was discouraged

it would be impossible to solve

this

problem. In conclusion.

although

Suggestion

Although

some people think that to protect their cultural identity the government should enforce designs

of

Suggestion

to

build

be

Suggestion

was

made in traditional style, I believe that it

is has

Suggestion

has

has had

is having

a negative effect on society. That means

this

would discourage people from developing new ideas, and there would be no growth in our

culture

.